Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
"Tony Hoyle" <tmh at nothing-on.tv> wrote in message news:3c7e50d0.90906609 at tony-home... > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:23:39 +0000 (UTC), "John Goehringer" > <jgoehrin at sct.com> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >In DoCVSThread, the handle passed as the parameter is eventually > >released with a call to CloseHandle(). > > > >The handle created by accept() does not seem to be completely > >released by CloseHandle(). With each TCP protocol request > >the service's handle count goes up by one. Requests over the > >named pipe do not make the service leak. > > > How are you measuring this? A socket is a handle under NT, so it > shouldn't make any difference. > > Tony > > _______________________________________________ > Cvsnt mailing list > Cvsnt at cvsnt.org > http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs With sysinternals.com Process Explorer - http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp.shtml The Task Manager will show it also, by adding Handle Count to the Processes display. The process explorer shows the leaked handle of type file, with a device name of \Device\Tcp. It's the handle with the highest 'value'. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list Cvsnt at cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs