Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
I'd personally rather see CVSNT commit in the order given--that way if there's any problem it's easier to tell where it should have been, no question. That said, it's so easy to just re-run the commit, it's pretty much irrelevant. And WinCVS should be doing the sorting.... why does it come out so "funny"? Are you doing flat mode then committing or similar? Glen Starrett glen.starrett at honeywell.com Senior Systems Architect, Tools & Technology Project Operations, Honeywell IC -----Original Message----- From: cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org [mailto:cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org]On Behalf Of Tony Hoyle Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 2:36 AM To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org cvsnt downloads at march-hare.com @CVSNT on Twitter CVSNT on Facebook Subject: [cvsnt] Re: Commit sequence? Bo Berglund wrote: > Tony, > I have an observation/question regarding the CVSNT handling for > commits where the user has been working in flat mode in WinCvs and > selected files from several directories: > It looks like CVSNT is *not* checking the list of files received from > WinCvs such that it sorts them in module order before processing. This > leads to many invocations of the loginfo scripts and indicates that > cvs is running many processes when it could have sufficed with fewer. cvs just does what you tell it... sorting really isn't necessary (if anything Wincvs should be doing it, but even then...). It's designed to work primarily from the command line, where that kind of thing would be so rare as to be not worh the code. Tony _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list cvsnt at cvsnt.org cvsnt downloads at march-hare.com @CVSNT on Twitter CVSNT on Facebook http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs