Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Nitzan Shaked wrote: > Yes and no. I *am* suggest to change the RCS file format, but it *will* > remain self-contained. Re-read my suggestion: I am suggesting to modify the > file itself, not use another file. The "use another file" was in the context > of how to do very quick per-file tags. What I wrote was that you could also > quickly add tags to the files themselves (if you don't want other metadata > files), and suggest to how do it quickly. But still in the same file. Modifying the file itself simply isn't safe. File reads and writes are not atomic (technically neither are renames but they're at least done in a single operation in the FSD rather than several, and NTFS keeps a journal). What you're taking about is an insert into the beginning of the file - that can't be done without rewriting the whole file anyway. Working on a live file in this way is a recipe for disaster. You couldn't implement a scheme as you suggest without completely ditching the RCS file format - which is a rewrite of 50-70% of of the CVS code, since it's tightly integrated... It's better to go all the way to an SQL database for that effort. Tony