[cvsnt] CVS v. CVSNT
ogware at gmx.net
Thu Jul 15 15:51:42 BST 2004
Tony Hoyle wrote:
>>that CVSNT has implemented in the same time. Yet the CVSNT docs are only
>>behind current development a few weeks or so. Strange, considering how
>>many people are behind GNU CVS while CVSNT is basically maintained by a
>>single person. Kudos to Tony!
> I'm flattered, but my documentation skills aren't that good... I know
> there are serious holes in the docs as they stand (getting better as
> docbook is very easy to work with) and I'm not really satisfied with
> them at the moment.
OK, if it makes you feel less flattered, I'll say the Kudos were for the
overall effort, not specifically for the docs. Most of all I was
comparing the up-to-dateness of the CVSNT docs with that of the GNU CVS
docs, even though I just had another look to make sure and it doesn't
seem to be as bad anymore as it was when I last checked...
Still, ... :)
JID: ogiesen at jabber.org
ICQ: 18777742 (http://wwp.icq.com/18777742)
More information about the cvsnt