[cvsnt] Latest updates
tmh at nodomain.org
Mon Oct 18 19:58:44 BST 2004
Dan Pupek wrote:
> What are some of the speed and stability fixes?
We don't muck around with the pathnames as much with this version, so
it's theoretically a bit faster. I've just been generally optimising as
I found bottlenecks, otherwise.
The stability is just down to extreme cases - for example it would fall
over if you want more than 25 levels deep.
> Is it advisable to upgrade from 2.0.58a if we are not using Eclipse?
If you're not experiencing problems, then it's probably not worth it.
More information about the cvsnt