Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Which corrupted binaries bug are you refering to, the corrupted binaries when a file is deleted? or something else? I suppose my question proves the point of needing a bug database. Matt S. "merkle" <news at merkleonline.de> wrote in message news:mailman.92.1116618807.32221.cvsnt at cvsnt.org... > Hi there, > > some observations from previous threads of this month (I don't quote > them all) > > - we have more and more background noise because of some missing basic > project policies I think we could avoid much noise with a better and > cleaner documentation, e.g. bug database, release notes, fewer and more > stable releases, etc. > > - we need a bug database (where has the mantis bug database gone ???). > Every project needs a bugdatabase why not use bugzilla ? > just browsing the news/mailing list is rediculus and very timeconsuming > (I have NOT the time to follow the mailing list every day) > > - we need fewer and more stable releases. I think releasing versions > with build numbers does not make sense > Please release fewer versions and better tested versions. also it is not > obvious which release has with bugs and which bugs are fixed... > > - bugs like the "currupting binaries" may not happend. It has to be > verified via a testsuite that such things don't happen. > The informations we put into cvs are just to important that i can afford > to loose information just because upgrading cvsnt > (and the new cvsnt has this bug.) Btw. what is that status of the bug. > My newsreader does not show any resolution of this bug ? > > - old archives for binaries have been removed. We are e.g. still using > 2.0.51d here without problems and the installer has disapeared from the > page. Why ? I don't want to rebuild this from source, since i can't > guarantee that i have the same build environment as you and so the > resulting binary might differ from your. > > - I was a user of UNIX cvs and switched to cvsnt about the 2.0.30 > releases. Up to that time cvsnt was stable and I was very satisfied. > Now in the meantime, things seems to get more and more chaotic (or > dynamically) so using cvsnt for a production environment is problematic. > I am really considering switching back to UNIX cvs or maybe subversion > (which is less dynamic and better documented, at least concerning > release notes, what has changed etc) > > kind regards, > Bernhard. >