Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
semone wrote: > We too have noticed considerably slower performance in graphing and diffing > with the following change: > > 1.1 CVS on and old single proc Linux 6.2 box > 1.2 Windows Clients using pserver > > and have changed to.. > > CVSNT 1.11.1.3 rc2 (Build 55) on a dual 800 PIII Win2k box > 1.3.7.1 beta 7 Windows clients using ntserver > > Hard to tell with that many variable changes what the issue(s) are with > respect to performance. I'm going to do some testing over the next week or > so. If anyone else has some ideas I'd be happy to hear about them :) What happens to the performance if you are using :sspi: mode? I am wondering if it might be problem specific to named pipes. Does the problem get better or worse when you use maximum compression? (If better, that kind of indicates a network utilization problem; if worse, that suggests the problem is CPU-bound). I think that Tony rewrote the protocol stuff after CVSNT 1.11.1.2, so if you could compare the performance with http://www.cvsnt.org/archive/cvsnt_1.11.1.2.exe then we might be able to isolate the problem better. Thanks, Brian _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list Cvsnt at cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs