Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:23:21 +0100, "Oliver Giesen" <ogware at gmx.net> wrote: >> It's part of the OS, but MS can't make up its mind what it's called... >> The code in cvs currently tries to load both. > >So, in theory it should work on W98, yes? I'll have to look again, if any of >the two filenames exists... Try the release nightly with the fix in.... it should work on that. I disabled sspi encryption under Win9x so it'll not fall over at least (which brings us back to how to tell frontends whether encryption etc. are available... must think of a good way of doing that). >> Not for development, it seems, judging by the feedback I get. Bugs >> for it don't get fixed quickly because they never get reported (for >> example command line cvs95 commits have been broken for about 6 months >> but someone only now just pointed it out), > >That sounds bad. So I probably shouldn't even test this over :ntserver:, no? Well it'll work with a frontend, but on the command line it can't invoke the editor, so commits always fail. I've just fixed this the other day. >BTW and totally OT: Does anybody know of any good and cheap (preferably free >of course) Windows-only remote control software? TightVNC does not quite >seem to cut it especially when you do a lot of typing... You can get Terminal Server client for win9x I believe, then you just have to run some kind TS capable machine at the other end (or buy Citrix Winframe if you're rich). Tony