[cvsnt] Re: sspi vs. ssh ?!?

Torsten Martinsen torsten at tiscali.dk
Sat Nov 8 20:13:35 GMT 2003

Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.

Ralf Steinhaeusser wrote:

>On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 10:16:15 +0000, Tony Hoyle <tmh at nodomain.org>
>>SSPI is secure enough provided the clients are all NT/2000/XP and you
>>switch encryption on.  
>Great! This is good news!
>I use TortoiseCVS and on I checkout I see
>In F:\Temp\CVS_Test: cvs -q -x update -d -P
>-x indicates encryption, right?
FYI, TortoiseCVS always enables encryption for those procols that 
support it - *except* for SSPI on Windows 98/ME, where enabling 
encryption for some reason causes a CVS crash.


More information about the cvsnt mailing list
Download the latest CVSNT, TortosieCVS, WinCVS etc. for Windows 8 etc.
@CVSNT on Twitter   CVSNT on Facebook