[cvsnt] Upgrade server from 2.0.58d
grstarrett at cox.net
Thu Jun 2 17:09:05 BST 2005
Manfred Moser wrote:
> Can you clarify what you mean with the taginfo script handling is
> broken. I am using 2.0.58x and cvsmailer and it seems to work okay for me.
Not all in 2.0.58x series had the taginfo problem -- I think 58a didn't
have it but had some other issue, but 58d does.
If you tag files with 2.0.58d, the file list sent to the taginfo script
is a pointer to the file name, not the file name itself. That causes
the list of files tagged to be garbage. To test, tag a file and look at
the resulting email from the system. If the name listed is the actual
name of the file that you tagged, then you don't have the problem.
More information about the cvsnt