Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to email@example.com.
On 8/14/06, John Hall <john-news3 at cambridgetechgroup.com> wrote: > "Tony Hoyle" <tony.hoyle at march-hare.com> wrote in message > news:ebpsjs$e8h$2 at paris.nodomain.org... > > >> It already is incompatible - see 'cvs update -n'. > >> > > No such command.. unless you mean -n update, which works in as much as it > > ever has (which isn't much - even the old cvs one is pretty broke). > > Apologies, yes, I meant 'cvs -n update'. CVSNT just ignores the -n flag, > whereas standard CVS outputs as if it has done an update but does not modify > the sandbox. Why do you say this? Since you mentioned this, I tested it today, and with `-n' update did not patch the local file. So `cvs -n update' works as expected. Best regards, Yongwei -- Wu Yongwei URL: http://wyw.dcweb.cn/