[cvsnt] Replacement for 'commit -r 2.0'?

Yongwei Wu wuyongwei at gmail.com
Sun Aug 20 06:54:07 BST 2006

Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.

On 8/14/06, John Hall <john-news3 at cambridgetechgroup.com> wrote:
> "Tony Hoyle" <tony.hoyle at march-hare.com> wrote in message
> news:ebpsjs$e8h$2 at paris.nodomain.org...
> >> It already is incompatible - see 'cvs update -n'.
> >>
> > No such command.. unless you mean -n update, which works in as much as it
> > ever has (which isn't much - even the old cvs one is pretty broke).
> Apologies, yes, I meant 'cvs -n update'. CVSNT just ignores the -n flag,
> whereas standard CVS outputs as if it has done an update but does not modify
> the sandbox.

Why do you say this? Since you mentioned this, I tested it today, and
with `-n' update did not patch the local file. So `cvs -n update'
works as expected.

Best regards,

Wu Yongwei
URL: http://wyw.dcweb.cn/

More information about the cvsnt mailing list
Download the latest CVSNT, TortosieCVS, WinCVS etc. for Windows 8 etc.
@CVSNT on Twitter   CVSNT on Facebook