Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to email@example.com.
Totally agree - it is absolutely worth being 100% accurate and precise with this stuff. CM issues are *too* important to be only approximately right. Thanks for the clarification. Tim >On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:14:34 +0000, Tim Chippington Derrick ><tim at chippingtonderrick.co.uk> wrote: > > >Don't *ever* try to force the revision numbers - it won't work any > >more and is associated with a broken way of thinking. This is a > >*very* common mistake that many people make when they don't > >understand what is going on. Instead just tag all the files with some > >meaningful name like "V2.0" and then you can always retrieve that set >Except periods are not allowed in tags... >You need tag 'Ver2-0' or something like that. > > >of files with the correct versions by specifying the correct tag on > >checkout. Trust us on this - you can almost totally ignore the > >individual version numbers as they don't really help you that much. > >There are no individual *version* numbers, but there are *revision* >numbers and those are maintained by CVS on a file-by-file basis. > >Nitpicking, I know, but I think that here is a need for correct >syntax. >Your message contents is all right! :-) > >HTH > >/Bo >(Bo Berglund, developer in Sweden) >_______________________________________________ >cvsnt mailing list >cvsnt at cvsnt.org cvsnt downloads at march-hare.com @CVSNT on Twitter CVSNT on Facebook >http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs