[evs] Current status

Kelly F. Hickel kfh at mqsoftware.com
Sun Jan 14 02:15:23 GMT 2007

Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.

Then it should work as is.   You could improve it by an unknown
percentage by removing the list and just returning the highest candidate
revision number.  (or not, it's 90% faster as it is, so what's another
few percent? ;> )


> -----Original Message-----
> From: evs-bounces at cvsnt.org [mailto:evs-bounces at cvsnt.org] On Behalf
> Tony Hoyle
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 7:18 PM
> To: evs at cvsnt.org
> Subject: Re: [evs] Current status
> Kelly F. Hickel wrote:
> > it's not set currently.  An unpatched cvs 1.12 would ignore the
> > that had been created with a CVS_LOCAL_BRANCH_NUM value, one with
> > current patch would choose the highest unused value.  There's some
> > question as to which is correct.  If the old behavior is what you
> We've always been clear - RCS version numbers (and therefore branch
> numbers) are internally generated server data.
> Whatever scheme is used, as long as it still fits within the general
> pattern of RCS version numbers (<parent>.<branch>.<revision> normally,
> and branch is normally an even number greater than zero) so that
> frontends can still graph it etc. then it could be random for all we
> care (and if it's faster to randomise it then feel free to do so).
> Tony
> _______________________________________________
> evs mailing list
> evs at cvsnt.org
> http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evs

More information about the evs mailing list