Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Kelly F. Hickel wrote: > Then it should work as is. You could improve it by an unknown > percentage by removing the list and just returning the highest candidate > revision number. (or not, it's 90% faster as it is, so what's another > few percent? ;> ) Well you're avoiding memory allocation, which is one of the slowest operations... it'd be more than a few percent I'd expect. I assume you're just taking out the inneficiency of RCS_magicrev (which could clearly work better the other way around - do the walklist and have it return a candidate branch, then test for the physical revision.. 99% of the time you'd only have to go through a single iteration). Tony