Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
En Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:44:21 -0300, Arthur Barrett <arthur.barrett at march-hare.com> escribió: > Gabriel Genellina, > >> May I suggest using more "separate" version numbers? >> For an outsider, 2.5.03 and 2.5.04 appear to be essentially the same >> version, just with small bugs fixed. And a number like 2.6 means "new >> features" not present in 2.5. At least that's what I would >> expect without knowing the CVSNT history. > > This should be in the FAQ - we've followed this pattern years now... > > > The version number is V.NN.XX.BBBB > > V = major architecture changes > NN = significant architecture changes > XX = feature releases > BBBB = bug fixes But that's not the format used in the banner: > cvs ver Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.5.03 (Scorpio) Build 2382 (client/server) Most people would say the version number is 2.5.03, not 2.5.03.2382 > Eg: > 1.11 to 2.0 > major architecture changes, eg: ditching C for C++ > > 2.x to 3.1 > major architecture changes, eg: ditching RCS for Relational DB. Thanks; btw, last time I searched, I could not find a changelog for CVSNT, is it available somewhere? -- Gabriel Genellina